AVS 64th International Symposium & Exhibition | |
Thin Films Division | Wednesday Sessions |
Session TF+EM+MI-WeM |
Session: | Thin Films for Microelectronics |
Presenter: | John Conley, Jr., Oregon State University |
Authors: | D.Z. Austin, Oregon State University K. Holden, Oregon State University J.F. Conley, Jr., Oregon State University |
Correspondent: | Click to Email |
Back-end-of-line metal-insulator-metal capacitors (MIMCAPs) require increasing capacitance density (Cox) while maintaining low leakage current density (Jleak). In addition, analog and mixed signal (AMS) applications are particularly sensitive to nonlinearity of capacitance-voltage (CV), empirically characterized by the quadratic voltage coefficient of capacitance, αVCC. Scaling of MIMCAPs for AMS applications is increasingly challenging as Cox, Jleak, and αVCC are all inversely proportional to dielectric thickness (dox). Despite its technological importance, the fundamental mechanisms responsible for αVCC are not fully understood. It is well established that the "bulk" dielectric material has a dominant effect, where αVCC increases with increasing dielectric constant and roughly as 1/dox2. However, the influence of the electrode interfaces is not currently understood. Of the few studies that have considered the impact of the electrodes on αVCC, most have focused on interfacial layer oxides (ILOs).
In this work, metals with low enthalpy of oxide formation (ΔHox), are used to examine the influence of the top electrode interface, in the absence of a significant ILO, on the CV nonlinearity of TaN bottom electrode MIMCAPs with various thickness ALD HfO2 and Al2O3. If non-linearity is purely a bulk effect then normalizing for dox, one would expect that the electric field coefficient of capacitance (αECC) should be independent of dox. Instead, we find that αECCdecreases with decreasing dox, indicating either an ILO or the direct influence of the interface. A plot of capacitive equivalent thickness vs. optical thickness rules out an ILO. For Au, Ag, Pd, and Ni, αECC increases with increasing dox, saturating for thick oxides. It has been proposed that for positive αVCC materials (Cox(V) increases with voltage), electrostriction and Maxwell stress lead to a vertical compression of the oxide under applied fields that results in increased capacitance. We further propose that the oxide must expand horizontally to maintain volume. This expansion results in compressive stress in the oxide and tensile stress in the metal, concentrated near the interface. The electrode then serves to inhibit the lateral expansion of the dielectric, reducing overall αECC. Indeed αECC of 10 nm oxides was found to increase roughly linearly with increased oxide/metal % lattice mismatch. As thinner oxides are used to achieve higher Cox, the metal electrodes exert influence over a greater % of the oxide thickness, increasing the electrode importance and its impact on nonlinearity.
New understanding of the impact of electrodes on αECC should aid in rapid optimization of low αECC MIMCAPs.