AVS 63rd International Symposium & Exhibition | |
Spectroscopic Ellipsometry Focus Topic | Thursday Sessions |
Session EL+AS+EM+TF-ThP |
Session: | Spectroscopic Ellipsometry Poster Session |
Presenter: | Jaime Moya, New Mexico State University |
Authors: | J.M. Moya, New Mexico State University T.N. Nunley, New Mexico State University N.S. Fernando, New Mexico State University N. Samarasingha, New Mexico State University S. Zollner, New Mexico State University |
Correspondent: | Click to Email |
To study the vibrational modes of GeO2, we produced a set of thermal GeO2 oxides ranging from 45 to 136 nm in thickness. Receiving a set of Ge Bulk wafers, we cleaved and roughened the back sides via an aluminum abrasive to avoid backside reflections. To remove carbon-containing surface contaminants and leave a stable oxide on the wafer, we performed a hybrid dry/wet clean. The dry clean was done by subjecting the wafer to an ozone clean in an ultrapure oxygen environment while heating the sample to 150°C for 1 hour, followed by a 30 minute incubation period. The samples were then cleaned ultrasonically for 20 minutes in deionized water followed by 20 minutes in isopropanol. No harsh chemicals were used. The samples were then dried with nitrogen and annealed at 270 kPa and 550°C in ultrapure oxygen for a few hours to achieve different oxide thicknesses.
Using Fourier-transform infrared ellipsometry, the ellipsometric angles ψ and Δ were measured from 250 to 6000cm-1 at several angles of incidence (60° to 75°). The infrared lattice absorption peak of the amorphous GeO2 was fit with a Lorentz oscillator.
When comparing our results to Lippincott’s et al. [1] transmission measurements of vitreous GeO2 formed by quenching hexagonal GeO2, we see a negative shift in vibrational frequency. The difference can be attributed to the different Ge-O bond length comparing the vitreous GeO2 and our amorphous thermal oxide. Our amorphous thermal oxide GeO2 samples have a longer bond length, corresponding to a weaker bond and a lower vibrational frequency. This shift also shows a lower density of our samples compared to Lippincott et al [1].
References
[1] E.R. Lippincott, A. Van Valkenburg, C.E. Weir, and E.N. Bunting, J. Res. Antl. Bur. Stand. 61, 61 (1958).