AVS 52nd International Symposium
    Magnetic Interfaces and Nanostructures Wednesday Sessions
       Session MI-WeM

Invited Paper MI-WeM5
Spin Polarized Scanning Tunneling Spectroscopy of Nano-Scale Co Islands on Cu(111)

Wednesday, November 2, 2005, 9:40 am, Room 204

Session: Magnetic Imaging and Spectroscopies
Presenter: O. Pietzsch, University of Hamburg, Germany
Correspondent: Click to Email

At room temperature, triangular Co islands can be grown on Cu(111), protruding two atomic layers high above the Cu surface. Two different orientations of the triangles are observed, indicating a stacking fault with respect to the fcc stacking of the Cu substrate in one case. We have studied the structural, electronic, and magnetic properties of these islands with spin-averaged and spin-resolved scanning tunneling spectroscopy at low temperatures. Using a non-magnetic tunneling tip, we found the electronic properties of the differently oriented islands to be clearly inequivalent. In differential conductance (dI/dV) maps this leads to strong contrasts at the appropriate energies with signal asymmetries as high as 50 percent. Applying a magnetic tip, another source of contrast with similar strength becomes accessible, originating from the perpendicular magnetization of the islands.@footnote 1@ We discuss the Co spin polarization which is strongly energy dependent and repeatedly changes sign. Quite similar to the Cu substrate surface, the Co islands exhibit a standing wave pattern in the local density of states. In the case of Co, however, the responsible dispersive state is spin-polarized. This spin imbalance modifies the oscillation amplitude. A comparison of the Cu and Co patterns as a function of energy reveals yet another difference: while the Cu patterns indicate two-dimensional free-electron gas behavior, the Co patterns are affected by lateral electron confinement. We compare our observations with models based on an exact solution of the particle-in-a-triangular-box problem@footnote 2@ and a multiple scattering approach.@footnote 3@ @FootnoteText@ @footnote 1@ O. Pietzsch, A. Kubetzka, M. Bode, and R. Wiesendanger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 057202 (2004).@footnote 2@ H.R. Krishnamurthy, H.S. Mani, and H.C. Verma, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 15, 2131 (1982).@footnote 3@ E.J. Heller, M.F. Crommie, C.P. Lutz, and D.M. Eigler, Nature 369, 464 (1994).