AVS 64th International Symposium & Exhibition
    Spectroscopic Ellipsometry Focus Topic Tuesday Sessions
       Session EL-TuP

Paper EL-TuP3
Ellipsometry Analysis of a Germanium-on-insulator Wafer

Tuesday, October 31, 2017, 6:30 pm, Room Central Hall

Session: Spectroscopic Ellipsometry Poster Session
Presenter: Rigo Carrasco, New Mexico State University
Authors: R. Carrasco, New Mexico State University
N. Samarasingha Archichchege, New Mexico State University
B.Y. Nguyen, Soitec, France
S. Zollner, New Mexico State University
Correspondent: Click to Email

Germanium based photonic devices attract a lot of interest due to the fact that its band structure is easily influenced by strain and alloying with tin. A direct bandgap group IV semiconductor will show an improvement in efficiency in optoelectronic devices. Utilizing a germanium-on-insulator (GOI) substrate is a key feature for future silicon compatible germanium based devices, allowing for easier integration by the microelectronics industry. [1]

Here, we analyzed the optical response of a GOI bonded wafer via spectroscopic ellipsometry. The ellipsometric angles, psi and Delta, and the depolarization were acquired from 0.5 to 6 eV in 0.01 eV increments using a J.A. Woollam variable angle spectroscopic ellipsometer (VASE) and from 0.1 to 0.8 eV using a Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) ellipsometer, allowing high precision measurements in the mid-infrared range. The measurements in both ranges were performed at angles of incidence from 60 to 75 degrees in 5 degree increments.

The optical response of the GOI wafer was modeled with four layers (Si, buried oxide, Ge, native oxide). As expected, strong interference oscillations were observed below the E1 critcal point of Ge. For Ge, we used the parametric semiconductor oscillator model and compared it to our previously determined optical constants of bulk germanium. We are particularly interested in differences near the direct band gap. The infrared phonon vibrations of the buried oxide were also visible in the measurements. The same measurement procedure was performed on the GOI wafer before and after cleaning the sample to observe the optical effects of a native surface oxide. While the pseudo-dielectric function of the GOI sample appeared different from that of a bulk Ge sample due to interference effects, the optical constants of the germanium layer only showed small differences. We did not find any differences in the electronic structure of bulk Ge and a thin bonded Ge layer.

References:

[1] B.Y. Nguyen, M. Sadaka, G. Gaudin, W. Schwarzenbach, K. Boudele, C. Figuet, C. Maleville

2016 Int. Conf. on Compound Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology, Miami, Fl, May 16-19, 2016