AVS 66th International Symposium & Exhibition | |
Advanced Surface Engineering Division | Wednesday Sessions |
Session SE+AS+TF-WeA |
Session: | Nanostructured Thin Films and Coatings |
Presenter: | Souvik Ghosh, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis |
Authors: | S. Ghosh, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis X. Chen, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis C. Li, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis B. Olson, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis C.J. Hogan, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis |
Correspondent: | Click to Email |
Aerosol deposition (AD) is a versatile technique for printing thin films. During AD, gas-suspended particles are impacted inertially on a target surface at high velocities. Subsonic impaction processes often lead to highly porous, weakly bound depositions. High-speed supersonic deposition, however, can lead to denser, mechanically robust coatings of metals & metal oxides. Supersonic deposition is hence a potential low temperature route to the additive manufacturing of thin films (<1 μm to >10 μm) of a variety of materials.
However, the mechanism of film densification & consolidation remains poorly understood, particularly because AD can function with spherical or fractal-like agglomerated particles, from both dry powder feeds & aerosol synthesis processes. In an effort to better understand AD, we examined the mechanism of thin film formation via supersonic impaction of SnO2 nanoaggregates on alumina, where we observed the formation of mechanically robust SnO2 thin films. SnO2 nanoaggregates were synthesized via flame spray pyrolysis (FSP) of Tin 2-Ethylhexanoate. These nanoaggregates characterized via differential mobility analysis shows a broad size distribution in the 40 nm -300 nm mobility diameter range. X-ray diffraction analysis of as-collected powders confirmed the formation of nano-crystalline SnO2. To understand morphological changes to aggregates during high speed deposition, a differential mobility analyzer was used prior to deposition to select aggregates within a prescribed mobility diameter. The aggregates were then deposited electrostatically at low velocity (at atmospheric pressure) & supersonic speeds after passing through a 200 μm throat width, slit-type, conically contoured converging-diverging nozzle. With low speed deposition, we observed highly branched, chain like aggregates; while after supersonic deposition, we observed denser aggregates with significantly lower number of particles. Images hence suggest that the aggregates fragment & restructure during supersonic impaction.
Fragmentation & restructuring was quantified by image analysis of TEM images to determine their projected radii of gyration, perimeter, end-to-end distance, & projected area. These four parameters were then compared to those from in-silico projections of quasifractal aggregates, enabling extrapolation of the 3D architectures of deposited particles. Plots of the number of primary nanoparticles in aggregates as functions of their inferred radii of gyration confirmed that supersonic deposition leads to both (1) fewer primary particles per aggregate (fragmentation) & (2) for a given number of primary particles, smaller radii of gyration (restructuring).