AVS 65th International Symposium & Exhibition | |
Surface Science Division | Friday Sessions |
Session SS+AS+HC-FrM |
Session: | Near/Ambient Pressure and Bridging Gaps between Surface Science and Catalysis |
Presenter: | Taiki Kato, Tokyo Electron Technology Solutions Limited, Japan |
Authors: | T. Kato, Tokyo Electron Technology Solutions Limited, Japan M. Matsukuma, Tokyo Electron Technology Solutions Limited, Japan K. Matsuzaki, Tokyo Electron Technology Solutions Limited, Japan L. Chen, Tokyo Electron Technology Solutions Limited, Japan |
Correspondent: | Click to Email |
Dry isotropic chemical etching processes are important for semiconductor manufacturing, but such processes often require subtle process tuning to achieve high etching rates and the desired etching selectivity between SiO2 and SiN. For example, the dry chemical etching solely with HF gas (Process 1) requires fine tuning of conditions for SiN etching rate because it has a peaky dependence on the process temperature; whereas dry chemical etching with NH3/HF binary gas mixtures (Process 2) requires subtle tuning to simultaneously maximize etching rate and SiO2:SiN selectivity. Notably, in Process 2, SiN etching rate increases with the etching time while SiO2 etching rate slows down with the etching time. This slowdown is attributed to the formation of an etchant diffusion barrier from the solid byproduct, AFS (Ammonium fluorosilicate). Because of these contradictions, it has been difficult to achieve highly selective and rapid SiO2 etching, thus a better understanding of the etching mechanisms is important to further develop the high selectivity required for the formation of scaled multicomponent semiconductor device structures. This study therefore focuses on revealing these mechanisms by using the quantum mechanics and by the analysis of reaction kinetics.
Firstly, Process 1 was studied with a quantum mechanical analysis by using the GRRM (Global Reaction Route Mapping) program. For this study, GRRM searched possible etching reaction paths automatically. From this reaction path search, it was revealed that SiN etching by HF gas, when used by itself, is much more rapid than SiO2 etching. Further analysis was conducted by the reaction kinetics analysis. The kinetics parameters comprised HF adsorption, desorption and etching reactions. This model shows good agreement with the experimental SiN etching behavior.
Moreover, Process 2 was studied with similar quantum mechanics and kinetics analyses. Quantum mechanics analysis revealed that NH3 combined with HF enhances both SiO2 and SiN etching reactions. An NH4F etching model was then added to the kinetics model. Because the etching byproduct, AFS, may be both an SiN etching accelerator and an SiO2 etching decelerator, we could model the SiN etching kinetics initiated by NH4F and propagated by NH4F + AFS. This model quantitatively agrees with the experimental SiN etching data. Likewise, the SiO2 kinetics model is composed of NH4F etching, the diffusion resistance through solid AFS and the sublimation of AFS. This model also shows good agreement with experiment.
These analyses reveal the chemical etching mechanisms and enable process optimization. Further discussion will be presented on AVS 65th.