AVS 63rd International Symposium & Exhibition
    Applied Surface Science Tuesday Sessions
       Session AS+AC-TuM

Paper AS+AC-TuM6
Advanced XPS Imaging and Spectromicroscopy: a Review of Current Capabilities

Tuesday, November 8, 2016, 9:40 am, Room 101B

Session: Practical Surface Analysis II: Microanalysis, Nanoanalysis, Atom Probe, and All Things ‘Small’
Presenter: Olivier Renault, CEA-University Grenoble Alps, France
Correspondent: Click to Email

At the practical level, XPS imaging is still poorly used today. This is due to on the one hand to instrumental issues with for instance the difficulty to produce nice secondary electron images to help quick navigation at the surface; on the other hand, lower counting statistics of core-level images necessitate high transmission imaging spectrometer and in some cases post-processing of image data sets using, e.g, PCA. XPS imaging and spectromicroscopy is nevertheless complementary to ToF-SIMS and Auger as it provides quantification and chemical speciation, besides accessing the mesoscopic scale. It should therefore deserve a much broader use to better understand laterally heterogeneous systems. On some instruments, electronic band structure imaging, equivalent to ARUPS microscopy, is becoming possible in routine use, widening significantly the capabilities of photoelectron microscopy with laboratory sources for important applications, e.g., novel 2D materials. In this contribution, we will review through various examples from graphene doping [1] to oxide-based resistive memories and single layer MoS2, the current capabilities of XPS imaging and spectromicroscopy as implemented with a PEEM-based commercial instrument enabling core-level images with sub-µm scale lateral resolution. The benefits of band structure imaging for 2D semiconducting materials will be addressed [2]. Finally, perspectives regarding photoelectron microscopy with hard x-rays will be drawn [3].

This work was performed on the Nanocharacterization platform of CEA-MINATEC.

[1] H. Kim, O. Renault et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 011605 (2014).

[2] M. Frégnaux, O. Renault et al., Surf. Interface Anal. 2016 (in press).

[3] M. Patt et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85 (11) (2014) ; C. Zborowski, O. Renault et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016 (accepted).