AVS 59th Annual International Symposium and Exhibition
    Scanning Probe Microscopy Focus Topic Wednesday Sessions
       Session SP+AS+BI+ET+MI+TF-WeA

Paper SP+AS+BI+ET+MI+TF-WeA7
Experimental Calibration of the Higher Flexural Modes of Microcantilever Sensors

Wednesday, October 31, 2012, 4:00 pm, Room 16

Session: Emerging Instrument Formats
Presenter: J.D. Parkin, University of St Andrews, UK
Authors: J.D. Parkin, University of St Andrews, UK
G. Hähner, University of St Andrews, UK
Correspondent: Click to Email

Microcantilevers are widely employed as probes not only in atomic force microscopy [1], but also as sensors for mass [2], surface stress [3], chemical identification [3], or in measuring viscoelastic properties of cells [4].
Use of the higher flexural modes of microcantilever sensors is an area of current interest due to their higher Q-factors and greater sensitivity to some of the properties probed [2]. A pre-requirement for their exploitation, however, is knowledge of their spring constants [5]. None of the existing cantilever calibration techniques can calibrate the higher flexural modes easily.
We present a method that allows for the determination of the spring constants of all flexural modes. A flow of gas from a microchannel interacts with the microcantilever causing a measurable shift in the resonance frequencies of all flexural modes [6]. The method is non-invasive and does not risk damage to the microcantilever. From the magnitude of the frequency shifts the spring constants can be determined with high accuracy and precision. Experimental data for the response of the first four flexural modes of microcantilever beams used in AFM with spring constants in the range of ~0.03-90 N/m will be presented.
The spring constants of the first mode determined using our method are compared to those obtained with the Sader method [7]. Finite element analysis computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of the experimental setup are used to provide an insight into the interaction of the flow with the microcantilever.
References
[1] F.J. Giessibl, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 949 (2003).
[2] J.D. Parkin and G. Hähner, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 035108 (2011).
[3] A. Boisen et. al. Rep. Prog. Phys. 74, 036101 (2011).
[4] M. Radmacher et. al. Biophys. J. 70, 556 (1996).
[5] G. Hähner, Ultramicroscopy 110, 801 (2010).
[6] G.V. Lubarsky and G. Hähner, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78, 095102 (2007).
[7] J.E. Sader, J.W.M. Chon, and P. Mulvaney, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 70, 3967 (1999).