AVS 59th Annual International Symposium and Exhibition
    Helium Ion Microscopy Focus Topic Wednesday Sessions
       Session HI+AS+NS-WeA

Invited Paper HI+AS+NS-WeA3
Surface Analysis using Channeling Contrast in NUHV Helium Ion Microscopy

Wednesday, October 31, 2012, 2:40 pm, Room 19

Session: Basics of Helium Ion Microscopy
Presenter: B. Poelsema, University of Twente, Netherlands
Correspondent: Click to Email

Helium Ion Microscopy, HIM, is a novel high-performance technique to image surfaces and with its high resolution, great surface sensitivity, enhanced material contrast, ability to investigate insulating material and large depth of field, it provides a viable alternative to classical scanning electron microscopy. A number of applications require improved vacuum conditions to achieve ultimate performance. The sharply focused He ion beam is, compared to an electron beam in SEM set-ups, very efficient in decomposing, e.g., hydrocarbons present in the chamber and thus on the sample surface, which may obscure a clear view of the sample. Where this phenomenon is beneficial for high resolution structuring, it may well negate the benefits of small spot size and reduce the acquisition time available for spectroscopy in material analysis. To substantially reduce this problem a Near UHV version of the HIM has been developed in close collaboration between the manufacturer, Carl Zeiss NTS, LLC and our group at the University of Twente [1].

We will report on a number of recent observations with special attention for a new contrast mechanism, i.e. dechanneling of ions that extends the high surface sensitivity – usually achieved in secondary electron images – to backscattered ions. We demonstrate [2-4] how monolayer “thick” organic and inorganic films, as well as self assembled monolayers can be visualized, even when adsorbed on heavier substrates, by changes in the backscatter yield. Normally thin layers of a light element on a heavy substrate are “invisible” in backscattered ion yields. The results can be explained semi-quantitatively in terms of changes of the channelling probability. These results highlight the relevance of proper vacuum conditions for achieving monolayer sensitivity.

[1] R. van Gastel, L. Barriss, C. Sanford, G. Hlawacek, L. Scipioni, A.P. Merkle, D. Voci, C. Fenner, H.J.W. Zandvliet and B. Poelsema: Microscopy and Microanalysis 17(S2), 928-929 (2011)

[2] A. George, M. Knez, G. Hlawacek, D. Hagedoorn, H.H.J. Verputten, R. van Gastel and J.E. ten Elshof: Langmuir 28(5), 3045-3052 (2012)

[3] G. Hlawacek, V. Veligura, S. Lorbek, T.F. Mocking, A. George, R. van Gastel, H.J.W. Zandvliet, B. Poelsema: submitted

[4] V. Veligura, G. Hlawacek, R.van Gastel, H.J.W. Zandvliet, B.Poelsema: submitted

Acknowledgments: Gregor Hlawacek, Vasilisa Veligura, Raoul van Gastel, Harold J.W. Zandvliet.