AVS 47th International Symposium
    Semiconductors Monday Sessions
       Session SC1+EL+SS-MoM

Paper SC1+EL+SS-MoM2
The Role of Inter-dimer Interactions in NH@sub 3@ Dissociation on Si(100) - (2 x 1)

Monday, October 2, 2000, 8:40 am, Room 306

Session: Chemistry of Silicon Oxides and Nitrides
Presenter: Y.J. Chabal, Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies
Authors: K.T. Queeney, Smith College
K. Raghavachari, Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies
Y.J. Chabal, Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies
Correspondent: Click to Email

The chemistry of gas-phase precursors to film growth on the Si(100) surface in ultrahigh vacuum is often well-described by localized interaction of the adsorbate with a single Si-Si dimer.@footnote 1@ However, our combined experimental and theoretical studies of the dissociation of NH@sub 3@ to form NH@sub 2@-Si-Si-H on this surface reveal that this reaction is in fact governed by a complex set of inter-dimer interactions involving both bare and adsorbate-covered Si dimers. External transmission FTIR spectroscopy allows us to probe both the lower-frequency @delta@(NH@sub 3@) modes of metastable, undissociated NH@sub 3@ and the higher-frequency @nu@(SiH) modes resulting from dissociation. By comparing our experimental results with density functional calculations describing two-dimer clusters, we find that the vibrational spectra can only be interpreted when inter-dimer effects are considered. Specifically, while hydrogen bonding between undissociated NH@sub 3@ and dissociated NH@sub 2@ species renders coupling of adjacent nitrogen-containing groups thermodynamically favorable, kinetic control of the dissociation process yields a predominance of the opposite configuration, resulting from the influence of dissociated species on the buckling of neighboring bare dimers during adsorption. We propose that such adsorbate-induced effects on the electronic structure of neighboring dimers may have general implications for controlling the two-dimensional ordering of reactions on the dimerized Si(100) surface. @FootnoteText@ @footnote 1@ See for example: R. Konecny and D. J. Doren, J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 106 (2426); B. B. Stefanov and K. Raghavachari, App. Phys. Lett. 1998, 73 (824).