AVS 46th International Symposium
    Vacuum Metallurgy Division Tuesday Sessions
       Session VM+TF-TuM

Invited Paper VM+TF-TuM3
New Plasma Sources for Ionized PVD

Tuesday, October 26, 1999, 9:00 am, Room 620

Session: Ionized Plasma and Chemical Vapor Deposition
Presenter: D.N. Ruzic, University of Illinois, Urbana
Authors: D.N. Ruzic, University of Illinois, Urbana
D.B. Hayden, Novellus Systems Inc.
D.R. Juliano, University of Illinois, Urbana
M.M.C. Allain, University of Illinois, Urbana
Correspondent: Click to Email

Three plasma sources have been investigated on a commercial magnetron sputtering system: an inductively coupled plasma (ICP) coil, a helical resonator, and an external helicon antenna.@footnote 1@ The main variables presented are the ionization fraction to the substrate, the deposition rates, the electron density and temperature. The ICP coil with an Al target achieved ionization fractions to the substrate in excess of 80%. The deposition rates are around 1500 Å/min. Electron densities are found as high as 2.6±0.3 X 10@super 11@ cm@super -3@. The main drawback to the ICP approach is that the coil is too intrusive, leaving visible shadowing effects which destroy uniformity. The coil sputters some, and also flakes off built-up deposited metal, which can contaminate the system. The helical resonator coil has a much larger diameter and avoids the shadowing effects. Ionization fractions are found with a Cu target at 73±15% under conditions with deposition rates of 1000 Å/min. The electron densities approach 2. X 10@super 12@ cm@super -3@. A ground at the center of the coil eliminates the sputtering problem by maintaining a DC bias of 0~V. There is still metal flaking off the coil as metal builds up on it. The helicon antenna sits remotely outside the vacuum system, so all shadowing and contamination problems are eliminated. Cu ionization fractions to the substrate of 51±10 % with a deposition rate of 850 Å/min. are found using one remote source. The plasma density was only 2. X 10@super 11@ cm@super -3@, but the temperature of that plasma was significantly higher than without the remote helicon present. Six or more remote sources are envisioned to sit around a sputtering chamber, which can help control uniformity while increasing the ionization further. Since there is no threat of contamination inside the vacuum chamber and the substrate to target distance can remain small, the helicon source may have the highest potential of these three secondary sources in industrial IPVD applications. @FootnoteText@ @footnote 1@ D.B. Hayden, D.R. Juliano, M.N. Neumann, M.M.C. Allain, D.N. Ruzic, "Helicon Plasma Source for Ionized PVD," Surf. Coating Tech., to be published (1999).