AVS 64th International Symposium & Exhibition | |
Applied Surface Science Division | Monday Sessions |
Session AS+BI+MI-MoM |
Session: | Practical Surface Analysis: Getting the Most Out of Your Analysis using Complementary Techniques |
Presenter: | Mikhail Klimov, University of Central Florida |
Correspondent: | Click to Email |
When profiling multilayered samples or even a homogeneous samples with rough surface SIMS depth resolution can suffer a rapid deterioration, particularly when polycrystalline metal layers are concerned. The back side SIMS was traditionally used to alleviate a loss of depth resolution during front side depth profiling. The traditional back side SIMS sample preparation involves painstaking polishing or/and ion milling, that requires considerable skills to produce a high quality finish surface that is parallel to front surface and terminated not too far from the interface of interest. Also, because the traditionally prepared sample is relatively large, the precise site specificity is, in general, unattainable.
I offer a relatively expedient FIB sample preparation (~2hrs.) for back side SIMS analysis at precise location and at exact distance from the front surface. The FIB sample extracted from the bulk has a typical lateral dimensions of 10 µ by 10 µ or less. In order to analyze such a small area, even smaller ion beam is required with diameter of 1µ or less to provide good depth resolution and high sensitivity. Also, it’s very much desirable that the ion beam was Oxygen or Cesium to achieve a secondary ion yield enhancement, particularly important for small area analysis. In my case, micron and sub- micron beam of O2+ ions was produced by RF Plasma source by Oregon Physics that replaced, for the first time, Duoplasmatron on ADEPT1010 Dynamic SIMS System by Physical Electronics.
The FIB sample preparation procedure is discussed in detail and the first back side SIMS results compared to the front side depth profiles.