AVS 62nd International Symposium & Exhibition | |
Plasma Science and Technology | Wednesday Sessions |
Session PS+SS+TF-WeM |
Session: | Atomic Layer Etching (ALE) and Low-Damage Processes I |
Presenter: | Alok Ranjan, TEL Technology Center, America, LLC |
Authors: | A. Ranjan, TEL Technology Center, America, LLC M. Wang, TEL Technology Center, America, LLC S. Sherpa, TEL Technology Center, America, LLC P. Ventzek, Tokyo Electron America, Inc. |
Correspondent: | Click to Email |
With shrinking critical dimensions, dry etch faces more and more challenges. Minimizing each of aspect ratio dependent etching (ARDE), bowing, undercut, selectivity, and within die uniformly across a wafer are met by trading off one requirement against another. The problem of trade-offs is especially critical for 10nm and beyond technology. At the root of the problem is that roles radical flux, ion flux and ion energy play may be both good and bad. Increasing one parameter helps meeting one requirement but hinders meeting the other. Self-limiting processes like atomic layer etching (ALE) promise a way to escape the problem of balancing trade-offs. ALE [1] was realized in the mid-1990s but the industrial implementation did not occur due to inherent slowness and precision loss from improper balance of self-limiting passivation and its removal processes. In recent years interest in ALE has revived and strides have been made by etch equipment manufacturers primarily through temporal, spatial or combination of these two pulsing approaches. Moderate success has been reported with some of the trade-offs purported to be managed. Difficulty meeting requirements is due to the inability of plasma technologies to control ion energy at low and precise values.
We overcome many of the practical implementation issues associated with ALE by precise passivation process control using plasmas with low electron temperature. Very low plasma potential, high radical flux and high bombardment flux are indispensable for achieving ALE. We demonstrate that ALE can achieve zero ARDE and infinite selectivity. Experimental results will highlight that careful consideration of surface process physics is required to achieve ALE and not simply “slow etching”. Without profile control, ALE is not useful. Profile control will be shown to rely on careful management of the ion energies and angles. For ALE to be realized in production environment, tight control of IAD is a necessary. Experimental results are compared with simulation results generated using MCFPM [2] and theoretical scaling models to provide context to the work.
[1] S. Athavale and D. J. Economou, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 14, 3702 (1996).
[2] M. Wang and M. J. Kushner, J. Appl. Phys., 107, 023308 (2010)