AVS 55th International Symposium & Exhibition | |
Advanced Surface Engineering | Friday Sessions |
Session SE+PS-FrM |
Session: | Pulsed Plasmas in Surface Engineering |
Presenter: | E. Wallin, Linköping University, Sweden |
Authors: | E. Wallin, Linköping University, Sweden M. Aiempanakit, Linköping University, Sweden T.I. Selinder, Sandvik Tooling, Sweden E. Coronel, Sandvik Tooling, Sweden U. Helmersson, Linköping University, Sweden |
Correspondent: | Click to Email |
Metal oxides have been deposited using reactive high power impulse magnetron sputtering (HiPIMS) of metal targets in Ar/O2 gas mixtures. The use of HiPIMS has in previous studies of deposition of alumina been shown to drastically influence the process characteristics compared to conventional reactive sputtering [Wallin and Helmersson, Thin Solid Films, in press]. Under suitable conditions, oxide formation on the target was found to be suppressed, and the hysteresis effect commonly observed as the gas flow is varied during conventional sputtering was reduced, or even completely eliminated, using HiPIMS. In the present work, these investigations are extended to a wider range of process parameters as well as to other material systems, including CeO2, in order to better understand the reactive process. Based on this, reasons for the altered process characteristics will be discussed. Moreover, film properties of alumina deposited by this type of process have been investigated. α-alumina was found to form readily on both cemented carbide and Mo substrates at a temperature as low as 650 °C. α phase growth was retained over the studied range of substrate bias voltages (from floating potential to -100 V), while growth at lower temperatures resulted in the formation of γ-alumina at 575 °C and x-ray amorphous films at 500 °C or lower. The film microstructure was studied using electron microscopy techniques, revealing a plate-like structure of the α-alumina films with wider grains and a denser structure for higher bias values. Reasons for the phase composition and microstructure observed with different process parameters will be discussed together with possible pathways for further reduction of the α-alumina growth temperature and improvements of the microstructure.