AVS 55th International Symposium & Exhibition | |
Graphene Topical Conference | Monday Sessions |
Session GR+SS+NC-MoA |
Session: | Materials Issues in Graphene from SiC |
Presenter: | G.G. Jernigan, US Naval Research Laboratory |
Authors: | G.G. Jernigan, US Naval Research Laboratory B.L. VanMil, US Naval Research Laboratory D.K. Gaskill, US Naval Research Laboratory J.C. Culbertson, US Naval Research Laboratory P.M. Campbell, US Naval Research Laboratory |
Correspondent: | Click to Email |
The electrical, mechanical, physical, and chemical properties of graphene have the scientific community in search of large area samples for technological applications. Since deHeer’s1 initial report of graphene formation by the thermal desorption of Si from SiC, efforts have been underway to use this method to make large area sheets of graphene. Creating graphene by desorbing Si from SiC is conceptually simple, but in practice it is very challenging to produce large area, uniform, electronic grade graphene. In this presentation, I will discuss the two processes we employ, ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) annealing (~10-8 mbar) and RF furnace heating (~10-5 mbar), to create graphene in areas ranging from 200 mm2 to 4000 mm2 on 4H and 6H SiC and on Si-face and C-face samples. As observed by Raman spectroscopy, both processes are capable of producing graphene, because each set of samples shows the distinctive D, G, and 2D Raman lines. Each process begins with the SiC surface being hydrogen etched to remove polishing damage and to create a uniformly stepped surface. However, the resulting graphene from each process has noticeably different characteristics. UHV production allows us to probe the graphene formation in situ with LEED, XPS, and STM. The UHV method results in single layer and few layer graphene films. Van der Pauw Hall measurements indicate the films have low mobility and the predominant carriers are electrons. AFM studies show that depending on desorption conditions (heating rate, final temperature, and cooling) the surface morphology is roughened due to formation of pits and islands. We believe this roughened surface explains the low mobility. RF furnace production allows us to form graphene in the same system that hydrogen etching is performed, thereby avoiding exposure of the sample to air. Van der Pauw Hall measurements of the RF furnace samples consistently have higher mobility than the UHV samples and the predominant carriers are holes. These films are thicker than the UHV samples and consist of multiple layers of graphene. The surface morphology does not consist of pits and islands, but instead shows lines of built up carbon along step edges. In the end, we want to produce graphene having the best characteristics of the UHV and RF furnace methods with controlled thickness (< 3 layers) and high carrier mobility (> 10,000 cm2 /Vs).
1C. Berger, et al, J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 19912-19916 (2004).