AVS 66th International Symposium & Exhibition
    Surface Science Division Tuesday Sessions
       Session SS+2D+HC-TuM

Paper SS+2D+HC-TuM5
The Large Effect of Solvents on Heats of Adsorption versus Gas Phase Explained with a Simple Bond-additivity Model: A Case Study with Phenol on Pt(111) in Water

Tuesday, October 22, 2019, 9:20 am, Room A220-221

Session: Atom Manipulation and Synthesis/Oxide Surface Reactions & Flash Session
Presenter: Charles T. Campbell, University of Washington
Authors: C.T. Campbell, University of Washington
N. Singh, University of Michigan
J.R. Rumptz, University of Washington
Correspondent: Click to Email

The low-coverage heat of adsorption of phenol on Pt(111) facets of a Pt wire in aqueous phase is approximately 21 kJ/mol (relative to aqueous phenol)1, much smaller than the heat for gas phase phenol adsorption at this same low coverage on single-crystal Pt(111) in ultrahigh vacuum (200 kJ/mol from adsorption calorimetry2). Here we quantitatively analyze the individual contributions that give rise to this large solvent effect using a simple pairwise bond-additivity model, taking advantage of experimental data from the literature to estimate the bond energies. The dominant contribution to the lowering in heat when adsorbing phenol in water is the energy cost to break the strong bond of liquid water to Pt(111) (Eadhesion = ~116 kJ per mole of phenol area). The water-phenol bonding is lost on one face of the phenol and this costs ~50 kJ/mol, but this is nearly compensated by the new water-water bonding (~53 kJ/mol of phenol area). The results indicate that the intrinsic bond energy between phenol and Pt(111) is not very different when in gas versus aqueous phase, provided one takes into consideration the expectation that water forces phenol into 2D islands of high local coverage even at low average coverage (for the same reason that oil and water don’t mix). This also explains the lack of a strong coverage dependence in the heat of adsorption when measured in aqueous phase, whereas it decreases by ~60 kJ/mol with coverage when measured in gas phase. This bond-additivity analysis can be extended to other surfaces and solvents for any flat adsorbate. It clarifies why catalysis with molecules like phenol which have very strong bonding to Pt group metals can proceed rapidly at room temperature in liquid solvents like water, but would never proceed in the gas phase at room temperature due to irreversible site poisoning. We also present many new measurements of solvent / metal adhesion energies that will aid future analyses of solvent effects in adsorption.

(1) Singh, N.; Sanyal, U.; Fulton, J. L.; Gutiérrez, O. Y.; Lercher, J. A.; Campbell, C. T. Quantifying Adsorption of Organic Molecules on Platinum in Aqueous Phase by Hydrogen Site Blocking and in Situ X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy. Submitted2019.

(2) Carey, S.; Zhao, W.; Mao, Z.; Campbell, C. T. Energetics of Adsorbed Phenol on Ni(111) and Pt(111) by Calorimetry. J. Phys. Chem. C2019, 123, 7627–7632.