AVS 65th International Symposium & Exhibition
    Fundamental Discoveries in Heterogeneous Catalysis Focus Topic Thursday Sessions
       Session HC+SS-ThA

Invited Paper HC+SS-ThA3
Simplifying the Relationships between Catalyst Structure and Reaction Rates for Complex Mechanisms

Thursday, October 25, 2018, 3:00 pm, Room 201A

Session: Bridging Gaps in Heterogeneously Catalyzed Reactions
Presenter: Charles T. Campbell, University of Washington
Correspondent: Click to Email

Better catalysts and electro-catalysts are essential for many energy and environmental technologies of the future. Designing better catalysts requires knowing the relationships between catalyst structure and catalytic reaction rates, which are in general poorly understood. I will review here some concepts that clarify and simplify these relationships. While a typical catalytic reaction has a dozen or more adsorbed intermediates and elementary-step transition states, Degree of Rate Control (DRC) analysis can be applied to a microkinetic model of the best known catalyst material to show that the net rate really only depends upon the energies of a few (2 to 4) of these. For related materials, one only needs to know how the change in material affects the energies of these few ‘rate-controlling species’ to understand how rates relate to structure. This offers opportunities for designing better catalysts. DRC analysis also provides a simple way to predict kinetic isotope effects (KIEs), which can be compared to simple KIE experiments to verify the energy accuracy of a microkinetic model (that is often based on DFT energies). Such DFT energies can be used with DRC values to predict faster catalysts.

The chemical potential of metal atoms (um) in supported catalyst nanoparticles provides another simplifying concept for developing structure – rate correlations in catalysis. It has been known for years that this chemical potential enters directly into the rate equations for catalyst deactivation by sintering. I will show here that it also correlates strongly with the strength with which surface metal atoms bind adsorbed reaction intermediates (and transition states), which correlate with rates as outlined above. I will then review what aspects of catalyst structure control metal chemical potential. It can be tuned to lower values (relative to large particles of the pure metal) by mixing the metal with another metal with which it forms an exothermic alloy, and tuned higher by making the nanoparticles smaller and putting them on a support to which they have a smaller adhesion energy (Eadh). Quantitative equations that predict how um varies with size and Eadh, and how Eadh depends on the metal element and the oxide surface used as the catalyst support will be presented. These also offer opportunities for predicting faster catalysts.

· Work supported by NSF and DOE-OBES Chemical Sciences Division.