AVS 62nd International Symposium & Exhibition
    Biomaterial Interfaces Monday Sessions
       Session BI+AS-MoM

Invited Paper BI+AS-MoM3
Quantifying the Surface Chemistry and Overlayer Thickness of Functionalized Nanoparticles

Monday, October 19, 2015, 9:00 am, Room 211D

Session: Characterization of Biological and Biomaterials Surfaces (1)
Presenter: David Castner, University of Washington
Correspondent: Click to Email

Nanoparticles exhibit unique surface properties and require well-controlled surface properties to achieve optimum performance in complex biological or physiological fluids. Despite the widespread appreciation of the unique properties of high surface area nanoparticles there is a surprising lack of detailed surface characterization of these materials, especially for nanoparticles used in biomedical applications. This is in part because nanoparticles present significant challenges for surface characterization. Thus, there is a need to develop rigorous and detailed surface analysis methods for characterizing the surface of nanoparticles. Model systems with well-defined, systematic variations of surface properties are an excellent starting point for developing comprehensive, multi-technique surface characterization methodologies. We have developed methods for quantifying the thickness and structure of carboxylic acid (COOH) SAM functionalized Au nanoparticles (AuNPs) using XPS, SESSA and LEIS. The size, shape, and size distribution of the AuNPs was determined by TEM. Additional surface properties were characterized using ToF-SIMS and FTIR spectroscopy.

These methods were then extended to the covalent attachment of proteins to AuNPs functionalized with OEG SAMs. For the OEG functionalized AuNPs the type of end group (OH vs. OCH3) doesn’t have a significant effect on the SAM thickness and structure, but the size of the AuNP does. The C11 alkyl portion of the thiol molecules was well ordered on all surfaces (flat, 14nm and 40nm). In contrast, the OEG portion of the thiol molecules was better ordered and more densely packed on the 40nm AuNPs compared to the 14nm AuNPs. LEIS measurements showed OEG SAMs had a thickness of 2.0 nm on the 14nm AuNPs compared to 2.6 nm on the 40nm AuNPs. Protein G was immobilized onto the HO-terminated OEG SAMs via carbonyl diimidazole chemistry. On flat Au surfaces XPS showed a monolayer of Protein G was covalently immobilized with little non-specific adsorption. On AuNPs a monolayer of Protein G could also be immobilized, but significant non-specific adsorption was detected.

Recent studies on NPs with Au cores and Ag shells have shown that it is important to account for non-spherical particle shapes of the Ag shell and off-center locations of the Au cores to obtain good agreement between the SESSA and XPS results. Both deviations from ideal core-shell spherical particles result in higher than expected XPS Au concentrations, with the off-center Au cores having the largest contribution to this effect for the particular core-shell NPs examined in this study.