AVS 62nd International Symposium & Exhibition
    Actinides and Rare Earths Focus Topic Wednesday Sessions
       Session AC+AS+MI-WeA

Paper AC+AS+MI-WeA10
Covalent Mixing In Actinide and Lanthanide Compounds: Reliable Assignment of Cation Charges

Wednesday, October 21, 2015, 5:20 pm, Room 230A

Session: Chemistry and Physics of the Actinides and Rare Earths
Presenter: Paul Bagus, University of North Texas
Authors: P.S. Bagus, University of North Texas
C.J. Nelin, Consultant
Correspondent: Click to Email

The importance of covalent and ionic interaction and bonding in heavy metal oxides, for example for the actinide dioxides, AnO2, is controversial with some claiming that the interactions are nearly purely ionic and with others arguing that there is important covalent character. Similar questions also exist for halides and for lanthanide compounds. One way to view this is to consider how close the actual charge state of the cation is to the nominal oxidation state. Our analysis is based on using wavefunctions for embedded clusters which model the bulk oxides. With these wavefunctions, we show that considerable departures of the cation charge from the nominal value are a common occurrence. We also show how the departure from the nominal charge state depends on several factors including: (1) nominal oxidation state, (2) ligand, and (3) position in the row of the periodic table. It is also necessary to determine which metal orbitals are involved in the covalent mixing. For actinides, the natural choice is the open cation 5f shell but the normally empty 6d shell may also contribute to the covalent mixing and, in fact, may even have a larger contribution than the 5f. In order to characterize the extent and importance of the covalent mixing, two factors need to be taken into account: (1) the estimate of the actual charge state of the cations and (2), perhaps even more important, the contribution of the covalent mixing of the cation and anion frontier orbitals to the total energy of the compound. Our approach to address both of these aspects is to limit the variational freedom when we self-consistently optimize the orbitals of the models used to represent the compounds studied. By restricting the variational space, the importance of the mixing of ligand and metal frontier orbitals can be explicitly measured by determining the difference between a wavefunction where these frontier orbitals are excluded from the variational process and a wavefunction where they are allowed to mix with other orbitals. With this approach, it is possible to make quantitative estimates of energies associated with the covalent mixing as well as the effective charges that can be associated with the cations and ligands. Furthermore, it is possible to visualize the changes in the charge distribution for different degrees of variational freedom with suitable contour plots. We acknowledge support for this work by the Geosciences Research Program, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. DOE.