AVS 61st International Symposium & Exhibition | |
Fundamentals & Biological, Energy and Environmental Applications of Quartz Crystal Microbalance Focus Topic | Thursday Sessions |
Session QC+AS+BI+MN-ThA |
Session: | Applications of QCM |
Presenter: | Kaoru Ikuma, University of Massachusetts |
Authors: | K. Ikuma, University of Massachusetts Z. Shi, University of Texas at Dallas A.V. Walker, University of Texas at Dallas B.L.T. Lau, University of Massachusetts |
Correspondent: | Click to Email |
In this study, we examined the deposition of NPs onto surface-immobilized proteins to determine the importance of protein-rich domains in the interfacial interactions between NPs and biofilms. Such interfacial processes are the initial and potentially rate-limiting step in NP-biofilm interactions. The deposition kinetics and extent of model hematite (α-Fe2O3) NPs onto protein-coated silica surfaces were quantitatively measured by quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation (QCM-D). Model proteins including bovine serum albumin (BSA) and lysozyme as well as bacterial total proteins were used herein. The proteins were initially adsorbed onto either negatively-charged bare or positively-charged poly-L-lysine (PLL)-precoated silica sensors to assess the effects of the orientation of surface-immobilized proteins. In addition to QCM-D, other complementary surface-sensitive techniques such as Kelvin probe force microscopy and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF SIMS) were used to characterize the mechanisms of interaction between the NPs and the protein-coated surfaces.
QCM-D results indicated that for all tested proteins, the total deposition extent of hematite NPs was significantly greater on protein layers that were adsorbed onto bare silica compared to PLL-precoated silica sensors. TOF SIMS results showed that the amino acid profiles of the topmost surface of the protein layers on bare and PLL-precoated silica sensors were distinctly different, suggesting that NP deposition was greatly influenced by the orientation of the surface-immobilized proteins. Both the extents and rates of NP deposition were also dependent on the type of model protein. Based on the surface charge, topography, and hydrophobicity characterization results, the observed interfacial interactions between hematite NPs and surface-immobilized proteins appeared not to be controlled by one dominant interaction force but by a combination of electrostatic, steric, hydrophobic, and other interactions.