AVS 61st International Symposium & Exhibition | |
Plasma Science and Technology | Wednesday Sessions |
Session PS2-WeM |
Session: | Plasma Modeling |
Presenter: | Jason Kenney, Applied Materials, Inc. |
Authors: | J. Kenney, Applied Materials, Inc. S. Rauf, Applied Materials, Inc. K. Collins, Applied Materials, Inc. |
Correspondent: | Click to Email |
Design of inductively-coupled plasma (ICP) sources for industrial tools is a challenging process, often relying on multiple classes of models owing to differing design goals and model limitations. A basic progression may include two-dimensional (2D) plasma modeling to fix the source architecture; three-dimensional (3D) electromagnetic (EM) modeling to investigate feed structures, current requirements, and azimuthal uniformity; and thermal modeling of source components using heat loads from the plasma and EM modeling. For the 2D plasma simulation, a typical approach assumes that power is coupled into the plasma volume purely inductively [1], reducing the source calculation to computation of azimuthal electric fields arising from coil currents. This can be enhanced by modifying the equivalent circuit of coils and plasma to account for capacitive and resistive powers.[2]
The computational expense of a coupled 3D plasma and EM model—which would require a fine mesh to capture source details along with a large number of computational cycles to allow the plasma properties to reach steady-state—is generally avoided through appropriate assumptions. In the 3D EM model, the simplest assumption is to represent the plasma as a conductive medium with conductivity matching that of a plasma with assumed density (or density profile) similar to the plasma simulation. However, in this work, we consider the impact of a more realistic treatment of a plasma load in a 3D finite-element time-domain (FDTD) EM model. In this method, the Maxwell Equations are solved in a leapfrog manner, updating electric and magnetic field vectors in turn. Rather than assume the plasma is a fixed medium with assumed conductivity, we consider the plasma current through solving the linearized momentum conservation equation for electrons, which is coupled to the Maxwell equations. It is assumed that ions are fixed. In addition, we consider methods to capture the nonlinear sheath dynamics by treating the sheath as a nonlinear circuit element and embedding these elements at the plasma – material interfaces in the mesh.
Discussion will be focused on impact of ICP source frequency and power for low pressure conditions (~20 mT) typical of ICP operation.
[1] M.J. Kushner, et al., J. Appl. Phys. 80, 1337 (1996).
[2] A. Agarwal, et al., AVS Symposium (2014).