AVS 59th Annual International Symposium and Exhibition
    Thin Film Thursday Sessions
       Session TF+AS+SS-ThA

Paper TF+AS+SS-ThA3
Wet Chemical Surface Modification of Silicon Oxide and Oxide Free Silicon by Aluminum Oxide

Thursday, November 1, 2012, 2:40 pm, Room 11

Session: Thin Films: Growth and Characterization-III
Presenter: A. Vega, University of Texas at Dallas
Authors: P. Thissen, University of Texas at Dallas
A. Vega, University of Texas at Dallas
T. Peixoto, University of Texas at Dallas
Y.J. Chabal, University of Texas at Dallas
Correspondent: Click to Email

Wet chemical surface modification is a powerful method to change the chemical properties of surfaces. Although it has been used extensively, there are still many issues that limit a the applicability of these reactions. Substrate dip coating in aqueous solutions is particularly useful to facilitate both organic and inorganic layer functionalization. For instance, the bonding of phosphonic acid to silicon oxide is weak in water because the Si-O-P bond is easily hydrolyzed. We demonstrate here that this problem is alleviated by the addition of an ultra-thin aluminum oxide layer to the silicon oxide surface via dip-coating a silicon substrate in an aqueous solution of aluminum chloride. The growth kinetics of the aluminum oxide layer are characterized by several surface sensitive techniques and found to follow a Stranski-Krastanov mechanism. Once the aluminum oxide layer is in place, a self assembled monolayer (SAM) of octadecylphosphonic acid (ODPA) is attached by the “tethering by aggregation and growth” (T-BAG) method performed in a controlled environment. We demonstrate that this ODPA layer grafted on the aluminum oxide interlayer remains stable in water. We also show that, following the same wet chemical approach, we are able to attach aluminum hydroxyl directly on oxide-free silicon surfaces previously functionalized with 1/3 monolayer OH. [1] Finally, we show that our approach can easily be transferred to other metal oxides and discuss the most influencing parameters.

[1] Michalak, D. J.; Amy, S. R.; Aureau, D.; Dai, M.; Esteve, A.; Chabal, Y. J. Nat. Mater.2010, 9, 266-271.