Paper VT+MN+NS+SS+AS-TuA9
Epitaxial Niobium Thin Films for Accelerator Cavities
Tuesday, November 1, 2011, 4:40 pm, Room 111
The currently proven superconducting radio frequency (SRF) technology used in linear accelerators is based on bulk niobium cavities. Since this has a high cost and these cavities are approaching the maximum field gradients that they can withstand [1], development of a suitable, reliable, cost effective alternative to bulk niobium SRF cavities is needed. Attempts have been made to replace bulk niobium cavities with niobium-coated copper cavities since the thermal conductivity of a suitable base material such as copper is better than bulk niobium [2]. Coating niobium on SRF cavities is a promising but also challenging path, since there are several difficulties associated with various thin film deposition techniques and a lack of systematic studies pertinent to niobium thin film nucleation and growth leading to surfaces of greatest benefit.
Our systematic studies show that the transport properties, in particular the residual resistance ratio (RRR), are improved when niobium is epitaxially grown on crystalline ceramic substrates such as MgO and Al2O3, compared to niobium grown on (001) copper templates. Since grain boundaries are typically one of the main obstacles to superconducting transport, we show how the increased number of crystallographic domains that can occur during epitaxial niobium growth onto copper surfaces leading to higher density of grain boundaries can explain our results. We will discuss a route to improved transport properties while maintaining thermal efficiency by using alternative seed-layers grown on copper templates that can limit increased grain boundary density. We will show our correlated studies of microstructure and surface morphology (RHEED and AFM) and the resulting transport/magnetic properties (four point probe and SQUID magnetometry) illustrating possible mechanisms to improve SRF cavity performance of such niobium films.
This work is funded by HDTRA1-10-1-0072 from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency as well as a subcontract from Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility under contract DE-AC05-06OR23177 from the Department of Energy as supplemented by ARRA funds.
References:
[1] P. Kneisel et al., Proceedings of 2005 Particle Accelerator Conference, Knoxville, TN, TPPT076 (2005).
[2] S. Calatroni, Physica C 441, 95 (2006).