AVS 58th Annual International Symposium and Exhibition | |
Biomaterial Interfaces Division | Thursday Sessions |
Session BI-ThP |
Session: | Biomaterial Interfaces Poster Session |
Presenter: | Prabhanshu Shekhar, Carnegie Mellon University |
Authors: | P. Shekhar, Carnegie Mellon University F. Heinrich, Carnegie Mellon University and National Institute of Standards and Technology K. Zimmerman, University of Massachusetts Medical School M. Lösche, Carnegie Mellon University and National Institute of Standards and Technology L.J. Stern, University of Massachusetts Medical School |
Correspondent: | Click to Email |
The cytoplasmic domain of the T-cell receptor zeta subunit, ζcyt, a cell surface protein complex responsible for binding peptide fragments of foreign antigens bound to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) proteins, is sufficient to couple receptor ligation to intracellular signaling cascades [1]. These domains carry immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs (ITAMs), i.e. signaling motifs that are phosphorylated by tyrosine kinases following receptor crosslinking. The phosphorylation of ITAMs is a first and obligatory step in signal transduction. ζcyt has been shown to be unstructured in aqueous solution and to assume a helical conformation in the presence of anionic lipid vesicles [2,3]. Membrane binding and membrane-induced conformational changes likely plays an important role in signal transduction, but no direct structural information on these functionally important lipid-bound states was available so far. Using a synthetic membrane model, i.e., fluid lipid bilayers tethered to planar solid supports [4,5], we report surface plasmon resonance (SPR) results on the binding kinetics and neutron reflectivity investigations of the association of the disordered ζcyt with membranes. We determine the extent to which the protein penetrates into the bilayer and discuss structural details of the ζcyt–lipid interaction.
1. M. E. Call, K. W. Wucherpfennig, Annu. Rev. Immunol. 23 (2005), 101-125.
2. A. Sigalov, Semin. Immunol. 17 (2005), 51-64.
3. D. Aivazian, L. J. Stern, Nat. Struc. Biol. 7 (2000), 1023-1026.
4. D. J. McGillivray, et al., Biointerphases 2 (2007), 21-33.
F. Heinrich, et al., Langmuir 25 (2009), 4219-4229.