AVS 56th International Symposium & Exhibition | |
Applied Surface Science | Tuesday Sessions |
Session AS+EM+MS+TF-TuM |
Session: | Spectroscopic Ellipsometry III |
Presenter: | K. Hingerl, University Linz, Austria |
Authors: | T. Plach, University Linz, Austria K. Hingerl, University Linz, Austria V. Dragoi, EV Group, Austria M. Wimplinger, EV Group, Austria |
Correspondent: | Click to Email |
Low temperature plasma activated direct wafer bonding (LTPADWB) for Si-SiO2 interfaces is a process that lowers the required annealing temperatures, (from usually 900°c down to 250°C) necessary for reaching high bond strength. The mechanism behind this improvement is still under discussion: The low temperature steps for the hydrophilic process are interpreted as follows: Up to 100°C the substrate surfaces are held together via van der Waals interaction which is mediated by a few monolayers of water. In the range of 100-200°C the water diffuses away from the interface both along the interface and through the oxide into the crystalline bulk, where it reacts with the silicon and forms oxide. The remaining half of the bond strength is usually attributed to a closing of gaps at the interface[1], which starts with conventional techniques at the softening temperature of the thermal oxide at around 850-900°C.
In comparison the same surface energies for the LTPADWB process are already reached at 250°C. To clarify the mechanism for this process, different bonding experiments were performed to evaluate the lifetime of the surface activation and the achievable bond strength when using substrates with various orientations. By covering half of the wafer during plasma activation, comparisons between the activated and non-activated region could be made by mid IR and UV-VIS spectroscopic ellipsometry covering the energy range from phonon energies to the UV (30meV- 6.5eV). it turns out that the spectral shape of the phonon peaks as well as the spectral shape of the critical points in the UV (E1, E2) significantly change and even the peak position changes.
Correlation measurements, by Auger analysis and by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy.Interfaces of bonded wafer pairs have been performed in addition, as well as by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). TEM clearly shows that there is no discernible interface between the native oxide on one side and the thermal oxide on the other side.
From the spectroscopic ellipsometry data it was found that the top surface stoichiometry is chemically changed, which favors bonding. Finally a model for the mechanism that explains the experimental results will be presented.[1] Q.-Y. Tong, U. Gösele, Semiconductor Wafer Bonding: Science and Technology, Wiley