AVS 46th International Symposium
    Surface Science Division Wednesday Sessions
       Session SS2+AS+PS-WeM

Paper SS2+AS+PS-WeM9
Surface Structure Determination by Angle-Resolved Mass Spectroscopy of Recoiled Ions

Wednesday, October 27, 1999, 11:00 am, Room 607

Session: Ion-Surface Interactions I
Presenter: G.S. Herman, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Correspondent: Click to Email

Low energy ion scattering (LEIS) and direct recoil spectroscopy (DRS) are powerful techniques for the determination of surface composition and structure. The combination of time-of-flight methods with an electrostatic time focussing analyzer has recently resulted in a new technique - mass-spectroscopy of recoiled ions (MSRI).@footnote 1@ The MSRI technique has an advantage over LEIS and DRS in that it has much higher mass-resolution and sensitivities. Results related to the exchange of @super 18@O into samples will be presented to illustrate the high mass-resolution. Furthermore, recent results indicate that in the angle-resolved mode, structural determinations can be performed. Angle-resolved MSRI (AR-MSRI) results will be presented for CeO@sub 2@(001) and TiO@sub 2@(001)-Anatase films grown on SrTiO@sub 3@(001) substrates by molecular beam epitaxy and chemical vapor deposition, respectively. The experimental data are fit to calculations using the scattering and recoiling imaging code based on the binary collision approximation.@footnote 2@ The ideal CeO@sub 2@(001) surface is polar and predicted to be unstable. However, LEED results indicate that a sharp (1x1) pattern can be obtained. The structural model determined by AR-MSRI consists of an oxygen-terminated surface with a half monolayer of oxygen removed. This structure is consistent with a model based on the reduction of the surface dipole moment. The TiO@sub 2@(001)-Anatase surface has only recently been experimentally investigated in much detail. LEED measurements indicate that the surface undergoes a (1x4) reconstruction after a sputter and anneal cycle. A comparison between experiment and theory for several models for this reconstruction will be presented. @FootnoteText@ @footnote 1@ K. Eipers-Smith, K. Waters, and J.A. Schultz, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76, 284 (1993). @footnote 2@ V. Bykov, C. Kim, M.M. Sung, K.J. Boyd, S.S. Todorov, and J.W. Rabalais, Nucl. Instr. And Meth. In Phys. Res. B 114, 371 (1996).