AVS 64th International Symposium & Exhibition | |
Nanometer-scale Science and Technology Division | Monday Sessions |
Session NS+HC+SS-MoA |
Session: | Oxides in Nanotechnology |
Presenter: | Kimberly Hiyoto, Colorado State University |
Authors: | K. Hiyoto, Colorado State University E.R. Fisher, Colorado State University |
Correspondent: | Click to Email |
Metal oxide nanomaterials are desirable for solid-state gas sensors because of their low manufacturing cost and ability to detect a wide variety of gases through changes in resistance resulting from gas-surface interactions. The substrates that support these materials, however, are often brittle and their smooth surface limits the amount of nanomaterial that can be exposed to target gases. Recent attempts to address these issues utilize paper substrates, that are not only low cost, but flexible to allow for a more robust device. Moreover, the porous, fibrous morphology of paper substrates provides significantly increased surface area for attaching more nanomaterials when compared to a traditional substrate of the same size. Despite recent improvements to paper-based metal oxide gas sensors, tin(IV) oxide (SnO2) nanomaterials require high operating temperatures, thus have not yet been successfully translated to paper-based sensors. Here, we describe how low power (30 – 60 W) Ar/O2 plasma modification, can be used to enhance gas-surface interactions of SnO2 paper-based sensors while maintaining desirable bulk nanomaterial and substrate architecture. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy revealed plasma treatment increased adsorbed oxygen, which is thought to improve sensor response by promoting gas-surface interactions. Indeed, plasma modified SnO2 nanomaterials on a paper substrate exhibit improved response to ethanol, carbon monoxide, and benzene at ambient temperature. Furthermore, scanning electron microscopy demonstrates that plasma treatment does not damage the morphology of SnO2 or the paper substrate. Response and recovery studies on these devices will be discussed along with SnO2 nanomaterial gas sensors created on more traditional substrates (e.g. ZrO2) as another measure of sensor performance. A better understanding of how plasma modification and the resulting changes in surface chemistry affect sensor performance is an important step towards achieving improved paper-based gas sensors using SnO2 nanomaterials.