AVS 62nd International Symposium & Exhibition | |
Nanometer-scale Science and Technology | Tuesday Sessions |
Session NS+SP-TuM |
Session: | Nanoscale Imaging and Materials Characterization |
Presenter: | Hao Van Bui, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands |
Authors: | H. Van Bui, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands R. Bevaart, Delft University of Technology F. Grillo, Delft University of Technology J.R. van Ommen, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands |
Correspondent: | Click to Email |
The thermal atomic layer deposition of platinum using (methylcyclopentadienyl)-trimethylplatinum (MeCpPtMe3) and oxygen has been investigated for more than a decade and performed on various supports, including flat surfaces [1, 2], nanoparticles [3], nanowires [4] and carbon-based nanomaterials [5, 6, 7, 8]. It has been demonstrated and widely accepted that this ALD process has a lower limit of deposition temperature of 200 °C. Here, we demonstrate the thermal Pt ALD on graphene nanoplatelets using MeCpPtMe3 and dry air (20% wt. O2), and show that highly dispersed and crystalline Pt nanoparticles can be obtained at a temperature as low as 80 °C. The feasible low-temperature deposition is attributed to the role of the graphene support that can activate molecular oxygen to form O2- anions [9], which consequently enhances the oxidation reactions in ALD. Importantly, the low deposition temperatures (i.e., 80 °C and 100 °C) can prevent the ripening of nanoparticles and hinder the formation of new nuclei during the ALD, allowing for better control in particle size and distribution. In contrast, at higher temperatures (150-250 °C), the ripening occurs, and new nuclei are constantly formed during the deposition, resulting in a broader particle size distribution.
References
[1] T. Aaltonen et al., Chem. Mater. 13, 1924 (2003).
[2] T. Aaltonen et al., J. Mater. Res. 19, 3353 (2004).
[3] Y. Zhou at al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 101, 54 (2010).
[4] N. P. Dasgupta et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 12932 (2013).
[5] J. S. King et al., Nano Lett. 8, 2405 (2008).
[6] C. Liu et al., Small 5, 1535 (2009).
[7] S. Sun et al., Sci. Rep. 3, 1775 (2013).
[8] K. Kim et al., Nature Comm. 5, 4781 (2014).
[9] E. Gao and W. Z. Wang, Nanoscale 5, 11248 (2013).