AVS 62nd International Symposium & Exhibition
    2D Materials Focus Topic Friday Sessions
       Session 2D+EM+IS+NS+PS+SP+SS-FrM

Paper 2D+EM+IS+NS+PS+SP+SS-FrM9
Methanol Synthesis on Defect-Laden Single-Layer MoS2 Supported on Cu(111): Results of a First Principles Study

Friday, October 23, 2015, 11:00 am, Room 212C

Session: Surface Chemistry of 2D Materials: Functionalization, Membranes, Sensors
Presenter: Takat B. Rawal, University of Central Florida
Authors: D. Le, University of Central Florida
T.B. Rawal, University of Central Florida
T.S. Rahman, University of Central Florida
Correspondent: Click to Email

Despite being found to be the preferred structure in single layer MoS2, the sulfur vacancy row does not facilitate alcohol synthesis from syngas [1] because its narrow size limits adsorption, diffusion, and formation of possible intermediates. On the Cu(111) surface, strong interactions between MoS2 and Cu are expected to reduce the corrugations caused by sulfur vacancy rows, resulting in a larger exposure of vacancies to adsorbates which could enhance the catalytic activity of the row towards alcohol synthesis from syngas. Based on the results of our density functional theory (DFT) simulations utilizing the DFT-D3 correction for accounting the van der Waals interactions, we show that: (1) there is a significant charge transfer from the Cu(111) surface to MoS2, enhancing its catalytic properties, (2) the binding energies of CO and dissociated H2 increase by 0.3 eV in comparison to that on unsupported MoS2, indicating stronger interactions, and (3) the barriers for forming intermediate species in alcohol synthesis process reduce significantly in comparison to that on unsupported MoS2. On the basis of these energetics, we conclude the Cu(111) substrate promotes methanol synthesis from syn gas on single-layer MoS2 with a vacancy row. We will also present the energetic pathways for the formations of other reaction products such as methane, formaldehyde, and water, as well as that of (the reverse) water gas-shift reaction.

[1] D. Le, T. B. Rawal, and T. S. Rahman, J. Phys. Chem. C118, 5346 (2014).

*This work is supported in part by the U.S. Department of Energy under grant DE-FG02-07ER15842