AVS 61st International Symposium & Exhibition
    Scanning Probe Microscopy Focus Topic Thursday Sessions
       Session SP+AS+BI+NS+SS-ThA

Paper SP+AS+BI+NS+SS-ThA4
Surface Potential Investigation of AlGaAs/GaAs Heterostructures by Kelvin Force Microscopy

Thursday, November 13, 2014, 3:20 pm, Room 312

Session: Probing Chemical Reactions at the Nanoscale
Presenter: Nicolas Chevalier, CEA, LETI, MINATEC Campus, France
Authors: S. Pouch, CEA, LETI, MINATEC Campus, France
N. Chevalier, CEA, LETI, MINATEC Campus, France
D. Mariolle, CEA, LETI, MINATEC Campus, France
F. Triozon, CEA, LETI, MINATEC Campus, France
Y.M. Niquet, CEA, LETI, MINATEC Campus, France
T. Melin, CEA, LETI, MINATEC Campus, France
Ł. Borowik, CEA, LETI, MINATEC Campus, France
Correspondent: Click to Email

The Kelvin force microscopy (KFM) provides a spatially resolved measurement of the surface potential, which is related to the energetic band structure of a material. However, it depends strongly on the physical properties of the tip, e.g. width of the apex, the geometric shape and the stiffness of the cantilever as well as the surface sample state. The goal of this work is to investigate the surface potential measured by KFM on AlGaAs/GaAs heterostructures. For this study, we used a certified reference sample (BAM-L200), which is a cross section of GaAs and Al0.7Ga0.3As epitaxially grown layers with a decreasing thickness (600 to 2 nm) and a uniform silicon doping (5x1017 cm-3). The resulting stripe patterns are commonly used for length calibration and testing of spatial resolution in imaging characterization tools (ToF-SIMS, SEM, XPEEM..) The surface potential measurement is performed under ultra-high vacuum with an Omicron system by using two acquisition modes: the amplitude modulation (AM-KFM), sensitive to the electrostatic force and the frequency modulation (FM-KFM), sensitive to its gradient. Three kinds of tips have been used for this study: platinum or gold nanoparticles coated silicon tips and super sharp silicon tips.

We will present the measurements obtained with these different tips for the narrowest layers (typ. < 40 nm). The surface potential mapping reveals a contrast around 300 meV between Al0.7Ga0.3As and GaAs layers. However, we observed that this contrast vanishes when layer thickness becomes thinner. This loss of contrast cannot be only explained by the resolution limit of the KFM technique. Indeed, we will discuss the effect of the band bending length scale at the AlGaAs/GaAs interface related to the dopant concentration. The contribution of band bending between the layers is evaluated by a self-consistent simulation of the electrostatic potential, accounting for the free carriers distribution inside the sample and for the surface and interface dipoles. We will show that the electric fields of the narrowest layers recover each other, resulting in the partial or total loss of the contrast between Al0.7Ga0.3As and GaAs layers. The simulation results will be compared to the experimental results in order to emphasize that the surface potential contrast is not only influenced by the resolution limit.