AVS 60th International Symposium and Exhibition
    Thin Film Wednesday Sessions
       Session TF+AS+BI+EM+SE+SS-WeA

Paper TF+AS+BI+EM+SE+SS-WeA12
The Balance between Transparency and Roughness on a Superhydrophobic Coating

Wednesday, October 30, 2013, 5:40 pm, Room 104 A

Session: Applications of Self-Assembled Monolayers and Nano-Structured Assemblies
Presenter: C. Wang, University of Melbourne, Australia
Authors: C. Wang, University of Melbourne, Australia
A. Wu, University of Melbourne, Australia
R. Lamb, University of Melbourne, Australia
Correspondent: Click to Email

High orders of interfacial roughness are known to scatter light; as a result, superhydrophobic surfaces, which are inherently rough, generally appear opaque. Therefore, an ideal range of roughness that can provide both superhydrophobicity and low light scattering in the visible light spectrum is a highly attractive challenge. The use of self-assembling nanoparticles is a popular choice to generate the required roughness for superhydrophobicity. While such systems offer ease of fabrication and processing, coating thickness is generally kept to a minimum to reduce light scattering, below the light scattering threshold, typically in the sub-micron scale. The degree of roughness in a sol-gel synthesized coating can be manipulated using differences in solvent polarity and vapor pressures. There is a clear trend in solvent-particle and particle-particle interaction under polar and non-polar solvents, resulting in a difference in nanoparticle cluster size[1], which contributes to light scattering. Changes in vapor pressure can also result in surface morphology formation during the drying process. We demonstrate that a simple change in solvent polarity on a sol-gel system can increase the optical transparency of a coating of thickness > 1 μm from 82-96% to 93-100% transparent in the visible spectrum. Meanwhile, the increased drying temperature from 100°C to 350°C can transform the coating’s hydrophobicity to superhydrophobicity.

1. Khan, S.A. and N.J. Zoeller, Journal of Rheology, 1993. (6): p. 1225-1235.