AVS 56th International Symposium & Exhibition
    Surface Science Wednesday Sessions
       Session SS1-WeM

Paper SS1-WeM11
Key Processes of Ice-Multilayer Evolution during Growth and Annealing Studied with STM

Wednesday, November 11, 2009, 11:20 am, Room M

Session: Water/Surface Interactions & Environmental Chemistry I
Presenter: K. Thürmer, Sandia National Laboratories
Authors: K. Thürmer, Sandia National Laboratories
S. Nie, Sandia National Laboratories
N.C. Bartelt, Sandia National Laboratories
Correspondent: Click to Email

Although extensive research has been aimed at the structure of ice films [1], important details of the morphology evolution, especially for films in the nm-thickness range, have remained elusive. Our capability to image up to 30 molecular layers of ice with STM [2], enables us to track the film evolution during growth and annealing. In particular, we investigate the role of new-layer nucleation and surface self-diffusion.

As reported before by others, we observe that water deposited onto Pt(111) below 120K forms amorphous films, whereas metastable cubic ice appears between 120K and ~150K. At 140K and a mean film thickness of ~1nm the film consists of 2-3 nm high crystallites, embedded in a one bilayer high wetting layer. Analyzing the annealing behavior of these crystallites we find [3] that the rate at which new layers nucleate, and not surface diffusion, determines how fast individual crystallites equilibrate. The resistance to nucleate new layers even during deposition has a surprising effect on thicker films: The deposited water attaches preferentially to growth spirals around screw dislocations, promoting the formation of metastable cubic ice [2].

Finally, we report the first measurements of surface self-diffusion on ice. Using uniform 5-nm-thick ice films (grown at 145K) as templates, we deposited a fraction of a monolayer of water at 115K to create metastable arrays of 2D-islands. By quantifying the Ostwald ripening of these arrays upon annealing between 115 and 135 K, we extract temperature-dependent diffusion rates and determine the activation energy for surface self-diffusion to be (0.4+-0.1) eV [4].

[1] A. Verdaguer, G. M. Sacha, H. Bluhm, and M. Salmeron, Chem. Rev. 106, 1478 (2006).

[2] K. Thürmer and N. C. Bartelt, Phys. Rev. B 77, 195425 (2008).

[3] K. Thürmer and N. C. Bartelt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 186101 (2008).

[4] S. Nie, N. C. Bartelt, and K. Thürmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 136101 (2009).