AVS 55th International Symposium & Exhibition
    Biological, Organic, and Soft Materials Focus Topic Wednesday Sessions
       Session BO+AS+BI-WeA

Paper BO+AS+BI-WeA2
Secondary Protein Structures in Barnacle Cement

Wednesday, October 22, 2008, 2:00 pm, Room 201

Session: Advances in Surface Analytical Methods for Organic and Biological Interfaces
Presenter: D.E. Barlow, Nova Research
Authors: D.E. Barlow, Nova Research
G. Dickinson, Duke University Marine Laboratory
B. Orihuela, Duke University Marine Laboratory
D. Rittschof, Duke University Marine Laboratory
K.J. Wahl, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory
Correspondent: Click to Email

Understanding the chemistry of barnacle adhesion is of great interest in the areas of marine biofouling prevention and materials science of adhesives. While most work on the chemistry of barnacle adhesion to date has focused on identifying the protein composition of barnacle cement, relatively little has been done to directly characterize structure of barnacle cement proteins in their native states. Such studies should provide further insight into relationships between chemical structure and adhesion, as well as the types of biochemical mechanisms that may play roles in barnacle cement curing. We have used atomic force microscopy (AFM), circular dichroism (CD), and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy to characterize cements deposited on quartz and CaF2 substrates in seawater by barnacles (Amphibalanus amphitrite) transferred from silicone release panels. AFM imaging consistently shows that secondary cement residues left on the substrates are fibrillar. Circular dichroism spectra of cement residues on quartz showed negative peaks centered near 225 nm and positive peaks at about 195 nm, indicating that the barnacle cements are primarily helical in structure, but also contain some β-sheet components. This is further confirmed by transmission FTIR of cement residues on CaF2, for which the amide III band is found to be composed of a broad band centered ~ 1650 cm-1 consistent with α-helical structures, and components near 1685 and 1630 cm-1 consistent with β-sheet structures. These results suggest that the fibrillar structures are predominantly helical in structure, in contrast with fibrillar structures like amyloids that exhibit primarily β-sheet conformations.